Fire in the Hole, dungeons and dragons adventure review

By Derek Jones
Self Published
Castles & Crusades
Levels 4-6

Blovar Thistletine, a wealthy halfling, decided recently to remodel the wine cellar in his summer home.  Work progressed well for a few days until the crew arrived one morning to find a tunnel had mysteriously appeared in the floor of the cellar.  The crew tied a rope to one of the workers and lowered him down the shaft to explore.  A few minutes later, they could hear the poor worker’s brief scream of agony and the rope went slack.  All they recovered when they pulled up the rope was a charred end.  The workers refused to continue their work.  Mr. Thistletine is offering a handsome reward for a party of adventurers to explore the shaft and eliminate any threats to his beloved wines.

This nineteen page adventure uses six pages to describe 31 rooms in an underground bandit lair. It’s a hack-fest. It has some hints of knowing how to format things, but falls down on implementation.

I’m not going to judge this negatively for just being a hack. Some people like that. And, not even an exploratory game has to explore all the time, hacking IS a part of the game after all. This IS a little lop-sided in that direction, but then again so were the B2 kobold caves, I guess. (Although its been fifteen years since I looked at it.) So, it’s a hack. At the end there will scores and scores of slaughtered 1hd gecko-men and the water floors will run red with blood. The gecko-men looks like normal men, mostly, and can stick to the walls. That’s kind of fun. It combines both the “use a lot of humans” stuff that I generally prefer with actually having some monsters. Eel-men, etc would all do the same, I think? It’s aking to using chaos-men and mutants in Warhammer, I think. Keeping it grounded. And, there’s an order of battle for their getting indeed, which is nice to see. 

The map is hand drawn and clear enough. The adventure notes that all but two areas are flooded to 4” of standing water, and others have lights on. This should have been noted either on the map or by text on the map. These sorts of “always on” things should be front and center for the DM to refer to throughout the game. Either shade the map, etc (not feasible in this case since its hand drawn, at least not easily) or just put the text on the map. I note, without comment, the abundance of magical torches in the hallway that light the way … that only work inside THIS lair. *sigh* There goes immersion. Wait, now I’ve commented. Fuck.

Wanderers are doing something, although they are almost always gecko-men. A hint of humor is present in places, with them tormenting small cute animals or their leader pissed at the magic tapestries that show his mens devotion being transferred to his fire priests. Treasure is … ok? There’s about 5k in “normal” treasure and then also a scroll work 10k to certain buyers. That feels low for a a hack, and a little strange that its so portable.  And the 10k scroll could use more to it, given the lopsided nature. It would add a lot to a game if it were.

The adventure is using room names in combination to the room keys. So, something like “10. Larder.” Using room names is good, but they could be overloaded with a descriptor, such as “Viscera Larder” or some such. Set the DM’s framing early so they absorb the text in that context. There’s also a decent number of rooms that are empty. Such as that larder. And by empty I mean “the room has no text at all.” So you get “Larder” and nothing more. Or, for a living quarters “Empty. They are all out raiding.” Thus the descriptions of the rooms are VERY MUCH on the extreme minimalism side of the spectrum. So much so that I would suggest that there is not much here at all to work with. This is one step more than Palace of the Vampire Queen, and not a big step at that. 

This feels like the outline of an adventure. Something that gets produced that the final draft is then created from. While it states its a hack, it could do a little more to enhance SOME interactivity to break things up. And it could do more with its writing to create evocative descriptions. You’ve got a lot of choices in what you use at the table, why not choose something that does those things?

This is $1 at DriveThru. The preview is all nineteen pages. I can’t fault the dude for either the preview or the price. Like I said, the designer has some ideas of how to do things right but just isn’t there yet in implementing them.


https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product/350997/Fire-in-the-Hole?1892600

This entry was posted in Dungeons & Dragons Adventure Review, Reviews. Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to Fire in the Hole, dungeons and dragons adventure review

  1. The Middle Finger Of Vecna says:

    Man, that is some inspiring cover art

  2. Derek Jones says:

    Thanks for the review. This is my first published module and I’m sure I’ve got lots of room for improvement. It definitely has a high hack factor despite the possibility for some role play (when I’ve run it, my players hacked their way through the dungeon with no regard for sneakiness or diplomacy).

    I prefer a more minimalist room key, but I can appreciate how it doesn’t match your personal preferences (particularly your desire for brief, evocative descriptions that explode in the GM’s mind and your preference for the mythic underground experience).

  3. Derek Jones says:

    It never occurred to me to mark the map with notes about where there was standing water. That is a tip I’ll take forward and try to incorporate in my next module.

    The non-magical treasure comes closer to 10,000 gp. Melan’s review also mentioned feeling like the treasure was a little light for an RPG that gives XP for treasure. I was afraid I was putting too much treasure into the module when I wrote it up. I guess I’m a stingier GM than some. I generally award story-based XP, so I don’t focus as much on the treasure from an XP perspective. I’ll give more thought to the XP value of the treasure next time around.

  4. Derek Jones says:

    I wish the aspects of the module I am particularly proud of resonated with you. For example, I think the forge ogres and magic items are pretty cool (not a big surprise, since I wrote it). If the limitations of the adventure stood out to you to the exclusion of the positives, I’ll take that as a sign I need to dig deeper as a writer. On the other hand, my wife says you’re mean.

    I made the whole thing available as a free preview solely due to following your reviews. The map structure was also a product of what you’ve had to say about linear dungeons. I’ll keep following your reviews and I’ll crush your expectations next time. Thanks again for the review!

    • Anonymous says:

      Hey Derek–check out Bryce’s forums. Ask for some input there. You can post up a room or three for feedback, some people may comment with suggestions. I’d like to see you crush it next time.

      • Derek Jones says:

        I didn’t realize he had forums here. I’ll check them out as I get to work on my next adventure, Suction Cupcakery.

    • Stripe says:

      That is the best attitude you can possibly have right there.

Leave a Reply