Silver Swords #2

Eric-christian Alexander

The sorceress Shar’Almana built a vault long ago to hide some magical items that her Lord had no use for, intending to sell them once her service was no longer needed. However, for unknown reasons, she disappeared and her Vault laid unclaimed for centuries.

Well, so, I guess the jokes on me.

This is a review of The Secret Safe of Shar’Almana, an adventure in Silver Swords issue 2, a forty page digest zine. The dungeon has two levels, thirteen rooms over three pages (two digest pages having the keys) and … is minimally keyed with abstracted treasure. It is a non-entity. A nothing. One tenth of one step above Vampire Queen.

I’ve got an excuse. I saw that this issue had a setting where the Sun kills the Moon and the entire campaign world revolves around that. Arise fair sun and kill the envious moon! If you wanted to make the worlds best pessimist how would you start? Well, with an optimist full of joy. Duh. Of course.

The adventure here has nothing to do with that. That’s some other article. This adventure has thirteen rooms in a large font spread out over two pages, which includes the map on one of those pages and the intro on the other page. This leaves little room for the room keys. Never fear though, they are minimalist. Yeah, I know, I already said that. Hang in there. It will make sense.

The map is one hallway. There are doors off the hallway. Open the door and see a room. No other exits from the room. So you go down the hallway and open the next doorway. To the next room. There are several map styles that one could use. This one is, without a doubt, the worst possible. Yes, even lower in my mind than a strictly linear map. (Hmmm, maybe the “long hallway map” is a sub-genre of the linear map? I’ll have to think on that.) Anyway, the linear map at least can make the claim that it’s part of a plot based adventure and not exploratory and thus is aligned to the assumptions of that plot-based adventure. (Wrong! But it IS an argument that can then be debated.) THis don’t got that. It’s just a hallway with rooms hanging off of it. Minimally keyed.

How about that abstraction? Go in a room. Find a chest. What’s the chest have? The DM consults the text: “Give rewards appropriate for 2 levels higher.” Or how about “locked chests have at least 1 magical consumable.” Is it becoming clearer, now, how a pessimist is made? Arise fair sun and kill the envious moon! Oh, wait, it’s minimally keyed. Room 4. Goblin Warren. 4 goblins. [stats]. Yes, I feel all of the power of the  poetry of the language exercised in that brief statement. The long line of adventures stretching back to Vampire Queen. Lo, I see them. Lo, they call to me! 

Well, no. They don’t.  It’s minimally keyed. They don’t do anything.

So, you’ve got rooms that have maybe seven or eight non-statblock words in them. And those words are abstracted, pushing the work back on to the DM. 

This has two things in it. First, it has a talking brazier in the first room that is chatty and is you feed it 5# of food it will answer questions. Second, it’s got a room with shattered mirror glass on the floor. If you bring in a big mirror it shows a passage through a blank wall to the treasure room. You know, the one with a treasure 2 levels higher. That’s good content, both of them. There’s something fucking going on. It’s not described evocatively at all, but you can least see some interactivity there, a chance for adventure beyond “4 goblins.” 

There’s nothing here. My inner child is, once again, wounded to its core. And I have only myself to blame.

This is $3 at DriveThru. The only preview is the little flip-book preview, which doesn’t let you see what you are buying. Put ina real preview, so we can get an idea of what we are buying beforehand!

Now, on to more important things. Do I want a Jeep Wrangler with an Ursa Minor top?

Or do I want a Ford Ranger with a walk-in cap?

FCA quality is not good. But the removable wrangler roof means that the tent access is through the INSIDE of the Wrangler since it’s a full Wrangler replacement roof. Ranger is 2 feet long, which causes me a little anxiety in town, but that also means 2 extra feet of storage space for STUFF. Wrangler will let me go more places and NOT having a Wrangler leads to some anxiety about “what if I can’t get someplace I want to go in the Ranger?!?!!?” Realistically though, I can probably get every place within my (non-existent) skill level with the FX4 XL Ranger?  And, the Ranger is, I think, substantially cheaper? I’ll do the full cost breakdown today. You can assume KO2’s, winch, recovery gear, etc on both.

Yeah, that’s right, I just ended my shitty Dungeons & Dragons review is a #vanlife post. Suck it! (Are you a pessimist yet?)

This entry was posted in Dungeons & Dragons Adventure Review, Reviews. Bookmark the permalink.

15 Responses to Silver Swords #2

  1. Anonymous says:


  2. squeen says:

    Until you got to the vehicle purchase, this was one of your more lyrical reviews. I greatly enjoyed it.

    (Based solely on looks…I’d go for the Jeep.)

  3. Jonathan Becker says:

    When choosing a vehicle, I buy the highest quality I can reasonably afford that includes all the features I absolutely need. I then proceed to drive the thing until it stops running.

    With regard to reviews: have you reviewed any of Carlos Lising’s adventure modules (Casl Entertainment)? He’s published quite a few, and I’m trying to find info on them.


    • Bryce Lynch says:

      Hmm, no, but I’ll pick one up. Is there one you’re particularly interested in?

      • Jonathan Becker says:

        I don’t know anything about any of them. “Kill Marquessa” is the beginning of his Marquessa trilogy and riffs off an NPC of the old (TSR) Slaver series. “The Porcelain Sword of Queen Eshalla” also looks interesting (and 7th – 9th level seems a strange level grouping to me; usually I’ve seen 4-7 or 8-10 while this overlaps these ranges).

    • Legion says:

      “When choosing a vehicle, I buy the highest quality I can reasonably afford that includes all the features I absolutely need. I then proceed to drive the thing until it stops running.”

      That’s how I buy laptops. Solid advice.

  4. #vanfefe
    The oldest learned to drive about 6 months ago and just totaled our only vehicle. Sigh. So I’m buying anything the insurance will hopefully cover! Actually I’m hoping it just pays off the loan!! 🙂

    As far as the review, I really do dig the brazier and the mirror though. Sound like great ideas/objects to expand upon.

  5. Anonymous says:

    Sounds like The Worst Evar.

  6. Sevenbastard says:

    I’ve owned a 2 door Wrangler for over a decade and its a good truck. You can also get it with a manual transmission and I don’t think the Ranger comes with that option.

    I took my back seat out, which is super easy, and the area back there is fairly large. I assume in the 4 door you can take the back seats out as well and would give even more room. But i guess that depends on how many people you are traveling with.You can also take the doors off which is a lot of fun.

    The 4×4 is good, I have a rubicon and have never used it anywhere near its full potential but still had a lot of fun on forest service roads in northern Arizona and California. When I lived in Connecticut it was a fucking beast in the snow. Now that I live in a city the big benefit of the jeep is driving over those annoying curbs that you sometime run into when you are trying to go from the CVS to the Pet Smart and the parking lots don’t connect but you sure as hell don’t want to drive around.

    All that said my first vehicle was a 78 Ford F250 so I have a soft spot for Ford Trucks.

  7. Nicholas Spence says:

    One thing you get for linear adventures at least is a sense of sequence, which could be used for riding action/tension. With the corridor with doors, not even that can be assumed, since any door can be opened at any time. Definitely worse than linear.

  8. Luther G. says:

    I wrote Moonfall (the mini-setting you referenced during this review). Thanks for talking about it a little bit – I hope you liked it.

  9. chunkbot says:

    I already commented on the patreon post about those vehicles but I think the ford ranger offers more comfort for sleeping in it

  10. Eric Alexander says:

    Hey, thank you for reviewing my dungeon haha. To be fair, you paid 3 dollars for a bunch of stuff that many creators contributed, not just my dungeon. But you are very right about all the points you made.

    This was my first attempt ever at making something and as you said, it was poor indeed. But honestly, I’m grateful that someone took the time to read it and felt enough to write something.

    I appreciate the criticism and also that you felt that there was 1 or 2 interesting things. Thank you for time and I hope in the future I can come up with better content to put out.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *